The trade-off between housing density and sprawl area: Minimising impacts to forest breeding birds

Increasing housing density is generally assumed to confer negative effects on forest breeding birds. This implies we should build at low density over the landscape to conserve these species. However, for a given human population, low-density development must cover a large area, resulting in sprawl. A pertinent question is then: at what housing density are the impacts of a given human population on forest biodiversity minimised? For a given human population, it is unclear whether the impacts on forest biodiversity are less where housing density is high and sprawl area is small or where housing density is low and sprawl area is large. We addressed this question using the abundance, species richness and evenness of forest birds in Ottawa, Ontario and Gatineau, Quebec, Canada. First, we counted breeding birds at 22 sites representing a range of housing densities. We then used these empirical measurements to estimate forest bird abundance, species richness and evenness in four hypothetical development scenarios representing the trade-off between housing density and sprawl area. With the exception of the Undeveloped scenario (i.e., continuous forest), forest birds and forest interior birds were most abundant in the Compact scenario and most speciose in the Semi-compact scenario, whereas forest edge birds were most abundant and speciose in the Dispersed scenario. All three bird groups were most even in the Compact scenario. We conclude that compact housing development (building at high density over a small area) minimises the impacts of a given human population on forest breeding birds.